I understand that seamless is a fork of AAVE but what are the security measures for the protocol? Is there a multisig that has supreme control over funds and upgrades? If so what’s the process?
I also recently saw that new assets were added to the lending protocol via snap shot. Is there a paper trail of every governance on chain action? Via time lock it seems?
I think having these guardrails in place and transparent communication is important. Id like to put more money into lending but don’t feel confident in the lack of transparency.
Also your discord links are broken - can’t seem to join even after waiting multiple minutes…
And lastly for my own sanity, the audit didn’t seem to highlight any diffs between the seamless code vs the aave code; would be great to see these highlighted via diff in GitHub or a better diff checker than two commit hashes, some of which pointed to code that didn’t exist.
Apologies if this is a bit of a rant, I do want seamless to succeed but lately haven’t seen much to give me confidence to use it more…
Especially with undercollateralized borrowing…which seems very risky. Has any protocol done this correctly? If the protocol today exists as a 100% copy of aave 3, the risk seems to be multisig / admin auth. If it is modified those new modifications like the under collateralized borrowing could be a serious attack vector that needs to be bullet proof tested and audited and then retested before productionizing. Otherwise could jeopardize the funds on chain.